Football's footprint Uefa trumpets its green ambitions but opts to ignore elephant in the room

Didier Deschamps wasn't amused. Les Bleus had fought hard to see off an excellent Austria side in the evening game and needed to rest.

- Philippe Auclair

Yet it was well past 3am when the coach ferrying them back from the Düsseldorf Arena finally came to a halt at their hotel in Bad Lippspringe. The 180km trip had taken three hours, when a 30-40-minute flight would have allowed the players to be in their beds considerably earlier. Deschamps kept his thoughts to himself, however. It was not his role to question the commitment made by the French federation to minimise its carbon footprint, in accordance with the principles of "climate action and advocacy" outlined in the Football Sustainability Strategy that Uefa unveiled in December 2021.

The same principles have been applied to adapt the schedule in Germany to "maximise sustainability without compromising fairness", to quote Uefa's head of men's national team competitions, Marcello Alleca. The folly of Euro 2020's revolving carousel of venues 11 stadiums in 11 countries - would never be repeated. A more compact, greener tournament? Yes please, and thank God for that, everyone said, from fans and media to players and environmentalists. Unlike Fifa's ludicrous - and thoroughly debunked - claim that Qatar 2022 would achieve net zero, Euro 2024 would at least be a step in the right direction. Uefa meant business.