Golden glow Paris Games were a triumph, so why not just hold Olympics every two years?

We are knee-deep in Twixmas: that twilight zone between Christmas and new year, excess and reflection, lists and yet more lists. Over the past week there have been many saluting the best sporting moments of 2024.

- Sean Ingle

Yet across the globe there is one constant: these lists are dominated by a Paris Olympics seared into the memory. Nothing else came close.

Pick your day, relive the moment. Keely Hodgkinson, Alex Yee, Simone Biles, Leon Marchand, Mondo Duplantis, Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone and a men's 1500m final for the ages; I was fortunate to see them all up close. But even that list barely scratches the surface. As Christophe Dubi, the executive director of the Olympics, put it to me recently, Paris 2024 was like the Dude in the Big Lebowski: the right Games at the right time and place.

In fact it was so good, it even provided the most thrilling moments of the year in tennis and basketball - two sports where the Olympics are usually an afterthought not the pinnacle. Novak Djokovic's victory over Carlos Alcaraz was one of the great men's matches, while Steph Curry's "golden dagger" provided one of the great moments, and memes, in the dying embers of Team USA's triumph against France.

The TV figures were also strong, with the BBC's live coverage winning the ratings battle every day. So during this period of excess and reflection, a provocative question comes to mind. Would it be that wrong to stage the summer Games, this wondrous celebration of sport, more frequently? Perhaps, even, every two years?