In deciding that not all private property forms part of the "material resources of the community" available for distribution by the state, the court has sought to achieve a nuanced balance between the conflicting demands of individual rights and the state's obligation to ensure economic justice for all.
The judgment, apart from exemplifying the SC's ever-evolving take on the characteristics and extent of property rights within a socialist democratic republic, is a reflection of the changing attitude of the ruling dispensation towards some conflicts that have underpinned this discourse since the inception of our republic.
In Property Owners, the court addressed a long-standing debate over the interpretation of Article 39(b), specifically the phrase "material resources of the community".
The judgment carries special significance for its potential impact on future legislation. It refutes the interpretation that all privately owned resources automatically fall under the ambit of "material resources of the community", an interpretation championed by Justice VR Krishna Iyer in the Ranganatha Reddy case and subsequently followed in the Sanjeev Coke case.
It clarifies that while private resources can be considered "material resources of the community" in specific contexts, this is not an automatic categorization. By rejecting this broad interpretation, the Court, in a way, reaffirms the importance of individual property rights while acknowledging the state's role in regulating resources for the common good.
The judgment, however, also has significant implications for judicial discipline and the treatment of minority opinions.
This story is from the December 20, 2024 edition of The New Indian Express Nagapattinam.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the December 20, 2024 edition of The New Indian Express Nagapattinam.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
A Guilty, Albeit Predictable, Pleasure
In sequels to 'happily ever after' romantic films, the narrative often tests the strength of the lead couple's bond by introducing obstacles—be it physical distance or a potential rival sparking jealousy.
Getting to Do Spy Stuff is Fun
Keira Knightley speaks to Sally James on playing a secret agent in her latest spy thriller, Black Doves
A Story of Uneasy Love
The fast-paced love story between a Muslim girl and a Hindu boy explores the tension between tradition and modernity
Making 2025 Your Best Year
Eleven infallible strategies to transform New Year resolutions into habits
Sax and the City
The best hop, skip and jump spots for aficionados of jazz in its birthplace where the music never stops and feet never stop tapping
Making Her Blush Permanently
A latest beauty trend everyone is buzzing about has a tattoo element
Memorial for Manmohan is a Requiem for a Lost Dream
Dead people never really die. They are kept alive through man's endless need for ritual, both in the private and public realm.
It Maybe the Best of Times, but It is Surely the Worst of Times
Manmohan Singh, former PM and finance minister who launched India's 1991 economic reforms, died last week.
The Winning Edge
Entrepreneur Stuti Jalan is taking the story of Indian women to the global stage
Why H-1B Visa Is In Maga Crosshairs
Of these high earners, more than 25% were women. And more than 65% of these well-heeled H-1B applicants from India were sponsored by smaller US-based companies. The H-1B applicants sponsored by US companies generally had higher salary offers compared to those sponsored by companies based in India—who are anyway availing less number of visas in this category. Here's a look at the H-1B visa program and why it stirs a political pot and muddies the debate on immigration.
