Here's something that's surprisingly common: people who strongly espouse moral or noble ideals, but regularly use them to justify attacking and mistreating others - something which is surely neither moral nor noble.
Isn't this inconsistent? How can someone loudly insist they're a good person while behaving in ways that totally contradict this, without mentally shortcircuiting in some way? The answer is that there are many psychological and neurological processes that allow people to engage in this behaviour that, for want of a better label, we'll call 'virtue bullying'.
A lot of virtue bullying could be seen as virtual bullying, which is to say it's a lot easier online.
We've all seen Facebook posts that make some simple, morally solid claim, such as "Cancer is bad", or "I support victims of [latest disaster]", which are then followed by something like "Share if you agree. I bet 97 per cent of you won't."
Such posts are basically saying, "I'm a good, moral person... and I'll manipulate you and malign your character until you agree." This isn't the behaviour of a good person.
But it's not internet-specific. Wanting to protect children is a good, moral aim, but consider all the books and shows banned or attacked in the US under the guise of protecting children.
This story is from the New Year 2024 edition of BBC Science Focus.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the New Year 2024 edition of BBC Science Focus.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
EYE OPENER
Though this might not be what you see on a typical Valentine's Day card, it is what the human heart actually looks like.
Your skin has its own immune system
New, needle-free vaccines could target the skin directly
Scientists make major quantum teleportation breakthrough
\"Nobody thought it was possible,\" say the researchers
THE WORST IDEAS OF THE 21ST CENTURY
NOT ALL IDEAS CAN BE HITS. ALONGSIDE GROUND-BREAKING INNOVATIONS, 21ST-CENTURY SCIENTISTS HAVE HELMED THEIR SHARE OF WILD TECH FLOPS, DUBIOUS THEORIES AND OVERHYPED BREAKTHROUGHS. HERE ARE THE BIGGEST TO FORGET
10 IDEAS THAT WILL SHAPE YOUR NEXT 25 YEARS
Predicting the future is considered a fool's game. But it's one many of us like to play.
THE BIGGEST BREAKTHROUGHS OF THE CENTURY
We're a quarter of the way into the new century. To mark this milestone, we asked the UK's top minds to highlight some of the game-changing scientific breakthroughs shaping our world since the year 2000
DO THE SCIENCE COGNITIVE SHUFFLE
Trouble sleeping? A lot on your mind? Use this trick and sedate your synapses
WHAT DETERMINES HOW MANY ABS I CAN GET?
Assuming you're a human being, you have exactly the same number of abs as everybody else: two.
HOW CAN I IDENTIFY MY PSYCHOLOGICAL BLIND SPOT?
In the 1950s two American psychologists, Joseph Luft and Harrington Ingham, proposed a way of thinking about psychological blind spots - things you don't know about yourself - that they called the 'Johari Window' (the term is a combination of their first names).
How can I change my personality?
Want to become more confident, extroverted or assertive? Science shows that with a few simple changes, you can unlock your best self
