THE NEEDLE'S EDGE

An intriguing new theory says it's not what's in the jabs but how the needles are inserted that explains the rampant and varied Covid vaccine damage. Celeste McGovern investigates the Bolus Theory

As soon as the massive Covid-19 injection campaign began rolling out across the globe in December 2020, red flags followed. On day one of the launch—the much ballyhooed “V-Day” in the UK—two healthcare workers suffered anaphylactic shock from the vaccine. Within a week, six more reports of severe allergic reactions among American healthcare workers (including four at just one Chicago hospital) were reported.

By just two weeks into January 2021, the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) had already recorded 171 deaths from the shots—more than twice the total number of deaths from all vaccines reported in the entire year before. Given underreporting to VAERS of a factor between 10 and 100 times, the signal should have halted the rollout immediately.

By February, there were scattered reports around the world of nursing home residents developing Covid infections and dying in droves right after receiving the shots. Where none had succumbed during the height of the pandemic, “outbreaks” suddenly bloomed as soon as the elderly were jabbed in care homes in the UK, the US, Norway, Germany, Canada and more. However, all these deaths were dismissed as “tragic coincidences.”

By March, blood clot deaths were on the radar. More than 40 reported deaths from blood clotting disease saw Britain’s celebrated AstraZeneca jab halted in more than a dozen countries just three months into the campaign. Today VAERS has recorded more than 14,000 reports of thrombosis (blood clotting) and the coagulation disorder thrombocytopenia that can lead to uncontrolled bleeding.